Thursday 18 February 2016

Mothertalk, part 3: All Caught Up in Our Canadian Lives

In the third section, "All Caught Up in Our Canadian Lives", we learn about the early years of Mary's marriage, including the birth of her first two children, George and Mariko, and her two-year visit back to her family in Japan. Mary also shares stories about women she knew who had affairs or dabbled in prostitution to help make ends meet, a practice she says was ordinary in the circumstances. What leaps out at me from these disparate stories is the restrictions that women of Mary's generation lived their lives under, and the kinds of lives they had to lead. What would have happened if Mary had chosen to leave her marriage, either by following Japanese divorce customs by returning to her father's family, running away with the Osaka man, or with the help of a samurai nuptial sword? Would either of the first two options have yielded her a happier life? And what does her choice to stay with her husband say about her? Is it a sign of her character as an individual in some way, or of the strength of her culture's influence on her - because a Meiji man and woman, even in Canada, marry for keeps?

Other things I'm thinking about:

There have been a few rather violent stories scattered throughout the book so far. What does this say about the world Mary lived in? Do you think these stories are extraordinary? Does Mary imply some kind of moral from them?

Mary says she never learned much English, but enough to be able to speak her mind. In fact, this book is a translation from her own original words, but one written by her son in a way that tried to mimick her voice. How would this story be different if we were reading it in Japanese? Is it easy to forget that the text is a translation?

What other parts of this section did you find interesting and why?

Be sure to check back next week for some discussion on part 4!

-Carolyn

4 comments:

  1. Her recollections certainly paint an even more bleak picture of life for issei than typically represented. She seems quite matter of fact about them and a few times referred to being young and wanting adventure. Her admission about the man on the boat seems also remarkably frank, although since she didn't actually run off to California perhaps it shows the resolution of her chracter. She did suggest she was more emotional about leaving her children in Japan than I have heard before, understandable as her feelings are.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Also I thought it was funny how she mentioned seeing Manzo Nagano on the boat and that she was surprised to see later that he was the first Japanese and that she didn't think he knew he was either. Makes me wonder about all that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, it's kind of interesting to think about how we put these labels on people and events historically, but at the time, Manzo Nagano was just a guy...he didn't walk around with a sign saying "First Japanese immigrant to Canada" around his neck, it's only in retrospect that we've done that.

      Delete
    2. It makes you wonder who is around nowadays who will become a famous historical figure, a hundred or more years from now!

      Delete